Outreach

As a social science research project, INLOCADE is committed to producing high-class academic publications about the institutionalization of low carbon development. In addition, we will engage with numerous stakeholders and collaborate with partners in Germany and abroad.

We will regularly update this page as soon as new publications are available. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions concerning our approach, results, or any possible collaboration.

Publications

Find a brief selection of key publications from the previous project on carbon governance arrangements in the nation-state as well as an extended list of project-related relevant literature. We will update this section with research outcomes over the course of the project.

Elsässer, J. P., Hickmann, T. and Stehle, F. (2018) ‘The Role of Cities in South Africa’s Energy Gridlock’, Case Studies in the Environment, 2(1), pp. 1–7. doi: 10.1525/cse.2018.001297.

Fuhr, H., Hickmann, T. and Kern, K. (2018) ‘The role of cities in multi-level climate governance: local climate policies and the 1.5 °C target’, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 30, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.10.006.

Hickmann, T. et al. (2017) ‘Carbon Governance Arrangements and the Nation-State: The Reconfiguration of Public Authority in Developing Countries’, Public Administration and Development, 37(5), pp. 331–343. doi: 10.1002/pad.1814.

Hickmann, T. and Stehle, F. (2019) ‘The Embeddedness of Urban Climate Politics in Multilevel Governance: A Case Study of South Africa’s Major Cities’, The Journal of Environment & Development, 28(1), pp. 54–77. doi: 10.1177/1070496518819121.

Höhne, C. (2018) ‘From “Talking the Talk” to “Walking the Walk”?: Multi-Level Global Governance of the Anthropocene in Indonesia’, in Hickmann, T. et al. (eds) The Anthropocene Debate and Political Science. London: Routledge, pp. 124–145.

Höhne, C. et al. (2018) ‘REDD+ and the Reconfiguration of Public Authority in the Forest Sector A Comparative Case Study of Indonesia and Brazil’, in Global Forest Governance and Climate Change. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 203–241. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-71946-7_8.

Lederer, M. (2015) ‘Global governance’, in Bäckstrand, K. and Lövbrand, E. (eds) Research Handbook on Climate Governance. London: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 3–13. doi: 10.4337/9781783470600.00009.

Lederer, M. (2017) ‘Carbon Trading: Who Gets What, When, and How?’, Global Environmental Politics, 17(3), pp. 134–140. doi: 10.1162/GLEP_a_00419.

Lederer, Markus and Chris Höhne (2019): Max Weber in the tropics: How global climate politics facilitates the bureaucratization of forestry in Indonesia, in: Regulation and Governance, pp. 1-19, online first: doi:10.1111/rego.12270.

Lederer, Markus, Chris Höhne, Fee Stehle, Thomas Hickmann, Harald Fuhr (2020): Multilevel climate governance in Brazil and Indonesia. Domestic pioneership and leadership in the Global South, in: Wurzel, Rüdiger K.W., Mikael Skou Andersen, Paul Tobin: Climate Governance across the Globe. Pioneers, Leaders and Followers, Milton Park: Routledge, pp. 101-119.

Stehle, Fee, Thomas Hickmann, Markus Lederer, Chris Höhne (2020): Urban Climate Politics in Emerging Economies: A Multi-Level Governance Perspective, in: Urbanisation, pp. 1-17, online first: doi.org/10.1177/2455747120913185.

Stehle, F. et al. (2019) ‘The Effects of Transnational Municipal Networks on Urban Climate Politics in the Global South’, in Heijden, J. van der, Bulkeley, H., and Certomà, C. (eds) Urban Climate Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 210–230. doi: 10.1017/9781108632157.012.

Turnhout, E. et al. (2017) ‘Envisioning REDD+ in a post-Paris era: between evolving expectations and current practice’, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 8(1), p. e425. doi: 10.1002/wcc.425.

Acharya, A (2004) How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism. International Organization 58 (2), 239-275.

Alcantara, C, Broschek, J, Nelles, J (2016) Rethinking Multilevel Governance as an Instance of Multilevel Politics: A Conceptual Strategy. Territory, Politics, Governance 4 (1), 33-51.

Andrews, M (2013) The Limits of Institutional Reform in Development: Changing Rules for Realistic Solutions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/UK.

Andrews, M, Pritchett, L, Woolcock, M (2017) Building State Capability: Evidence, Analysis, Action. Oxford University Press, Oxford/UK, 277.

Arakelyan, I, Moran, D, Wreford, A (2017) Climate smart agriculture: a critical review. In: Nunan, F (ed.), Making Climate Compatible Development Happen, 66-86. Routledge, London.

Averchenkova, A, Matikainen, S (2016) Assessing the consistency of national mitigation actions in the G20 with the Paris Agreement, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, London. Barber, BR (2013) If Mayors Ruled the World. Dysfunctional Nations. Rising Cities. Yale University Press, New Haven, MA.

Beach, D (2018) Achieving Methodological Alignment When Combining QCA and Process tracing in Practice. 47 (1), 64-99.

Benecke, G (2009) Varieties of Carbon Governance: Taking Stock of the Local Carbon Market in India. Journal of Environment and Development 18 (4), 346-370.

Berg-Schlosser, D, De Meur, G (2009) Comparative Research Design: Case and Variable Section. In: Rihoux, B, Ragin, CC (eds) Configurational Comparative Methods. Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques, 19-32. Applied Social Research Methods Series, Sage, Los Angeles, United States.

Bernauer, T, Böhmelt, T (2013) National climate policies in international comparison: The Climate Change Cooperation Index. Environmental Science & Policy 25, 196-206.

Bernstein, S, Hoffmann, M (2018) The politics of decarbonization and the catalytic impact of subnational climate experiments. Policy Sciences 51 (2), 189-211.

Bersch, K, Praça, S, Taylor, MM (2017) State Capacity, Bureaucratic Politicization, and Corruption in the Brazilian State. Governance 30 (1), 105-124.

Blatter, J, Haverland, M (2012) Designing Case Studies. Explanatory Approaches in Small-N Research. Palgrave, Houndsmill, United Kingdom.

Bloomfield, A (2015) Norm antipreneurs and theorising resistance to normative change. Review of International Studies 42 (2), 310-333.

Blyth, M (2002) Great Transformations – Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Bogner, A, Littig, B, Menz, W. (eds.) (2009) Interviewing Experts. Palgrave Macmillan, London.

Brockhaus, M, Korhonen-Kurki, K, Sehring, J et al. (2017) REDD+, transformational change and the promise of performance-based payments: a qualitative comparative analysis. Climate Policy 17 (6), 708-730.

Bulkeley, H, Castán Broto, V (2013) Government by experiment? Global cities and the governing of climate change. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 38 (3), 361-375.

Burck, J, Marten, F, Bals, C, Höhne, N (2018) The Climate Change Performance Index. Results 2018, Germanwatch, Bonn.

Campbell, T, Fuhr, H. (eds.) (2004) Leadership and Innovation in Subnational Government: Case Studies from Latin America. The World Bank, Washington D.C., USA.

Candel, JJL, Biesbroek, R (2016) Toward a processual understanding of policy integration. Policy Sciences 49 (3), 211-231.

Capano, G (2009) Understanding Policy Change as an Epistemological and Theoretical Problem. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 11 (1), 7-31.

Carter, N, Jacobs, M (2014) Explaining Radical Policy Change: The Case of Climate Change and Energy Policy under the British Labour Government 2006–10. Public Administration 92 (1), 125-141.

Checkel, JT (1999) Norms, Institutions, and National Identity in Contemporary Europe. International Studies Quarterly 43 (1), 84-114.

Climate Action Tracker (2018) ‘Coutries’, https://climateactiontracker.org/countries/, accessed 05.11.

Collier, D (2011) Understanding Process Tracing. PS: Political Science & Politics 44 (04), 823-830.

Edenhofer, O, Madruga, RP, Sokona, Y. (eds.) (2012) Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation. Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Elsässer, J, Hickmann, T, Stehle, F (2018) The Role of Cities in South Africa’s Energy Gridlock. Case Studies in the Environment 2, 1-7.

Emmenegger, P, Kvist, J, Skaaning, S-E (2013) Making the Most of Configurational Comparative Analysis: An Assessment of QCA Applications in Comparative Welfare-State Research. Political Research Quarterly 66 (1), 185-190.

FAO (2018) ‘Climate-Smart Agriculture’, http://www.fao.org/climate-smart-agriculture/en/, accessed 6 August.

Finnemore, M, Sikkink, K (1998) International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization 52 (4), 887-917.

Fuhr, H (1999) Institutional Change and New Incentive Structures for Development: Can Decentralization and Better Local Governance Help? In: Welttrends (7, 25) Winter 1999; p. 21-51. 

Fuhr, H, Lederer, M (2009) Varieties of Carbon Governance in Newly Industrializing Countries. The Journal of Environment & Development 18 (4), 327-345.

Fuhr, H, Hickmann, T, Kern, K (2018) The role of cities in multi-level climate governance: local climate policies and the 1.5 °C target. 30, 1-6.

Geels, FW (2011) The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 1 (1), 24-40.

George, AL, Bennett, A (2005) Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. BCSIA Studies in International Security, MIT Press, Cambridge M.A., USA/ London, UK, 331.

Gibson, L, Wilman, EN, Laurance, WF (2017) How Green is ‘Green’ Energy? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 32 (12), 922-935.

Grindle, MS (2007) Good Enough Governance Revisited. Development Policy Review 25 (5), 533-574.

Gupta, J (2007) The Multi-Level Governance Challenge of Climate Change. Environmental Sciences 4 (3), 131-137.

Haggard, S, Kaufman, RR (1995) The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions. Princeton University Press, Princeton/US.

Hall, PA (1993) Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics 25 (3), 275-296.

Hall, PA, Soskice, D (2001) An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism. In: Hall, PA, Soskice, D (eds) Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, 1-70. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

Harvey, CA, Chacón, M, Donatti, CI et al. (2014) Climate-Smart Landscapes: Opportunities and Challenges for Integrating Adaptation and Mitigation in Tropical Agriculture. Conservation Letters 7 (2), 77-90.

Held, D, Roger, C, Nag, E-M. (eds.) (2013) Climate Governance in the Developing World. Polity, Cambridge.

Hickmann, T (2013) Private Authority in Global Climate Governance: The Case of the Clean Development Mechanism. Climate and Development 5 (1), 46-54.

— (2017) Voluntary Global Business Initiatives and the International Climate Negotiations: A Case Study of the Greenhouse Gas Protocol. Journal of Cleaner Production 169, 94-104.

Hickmann, T, Fuhr, H, Höhne, C, Lederer, M, Stehle, F (2017) Carbon Governance Arrangements and the Nation-State: The Reconfiguration of Public Authority in Developing Countries. Public Administration and Development 37 (5), 331-343.

Hildén, M, Jordan, A, Huitema, D (2017) The Search for Climate Change and Sustainability Solutions: The Promise and the Pitfalls of Experimentation. Journal of Cleaner Production 169, 1-7.

Hoffmann, M (2011) Climate Governance at the Crossroads: Experimenting With a Global Response After Kyoto. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Höhne, C (2018) From “Talking the Talk” to “Walking the Walk”?: Multi-Level Global Governance of the Anthropocene in Indonesia. In: Hickmann, T, Partzsch, L, Pattberg, P, Weiland, S (eds) The Anthropocene Debate and Political Science, 124-145. Research Series in Global Environmental Governance, Routledge, London.

Höhne, C, Fuhr, H, Hickmann, T, Lederer, M, Stehle, F (2018) REDD+ and the Reconfiguration of Public Authority in the Forest Sector: A Comparative Case Study of Indonesia and Brazil. In: Nuesiri, EO (ed.), Global Forest Governance and Climate Change:

Interrogating Representation, Participation, and Decentralization, 203-241. Palgrave Studies in Natural Resource Management, Palgrave Macmillan.

Hooghe, L, Marks, G (2001) Multi-Level Governance and European Integration. Governance in Europe, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, xvi, 251 p.

— (2003) Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-Level Governance. The American Political Science Review 97 (2), 233-243.

Huitema, D, Jordan, A, Munaretto, S, Hildén, M (2018) Policy experimentation: core concepts, political dynamics, governance and impacts. Policy Sciences 51 (2), 143-159.

IEA, IEA ‘Energy Law No. 30/2007’, https://www.iea.org/policiesandmeasures/pams/indonesia/name-140104-en.php, accessed.

Jackson, T (2011) Societal Transformations for a Sustainable Economy. Natural Resources Forum 35, 155-164.

Jaglin, S (2014) Urban Energy Policies and the Governance of Multilevel Issues in Cape Town. Urban Studies 51 (7), 1394-1414.

Jordan, A, Huitema, D (2014) Innovations in climate policy: conclusions and new directions. Environmental Politics 23 (5), 906-925.

Keck, ME, Sikkink, K (1998) Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

Kern, F, Smith, A, Shaw, C, Raven, R, Verhees, B (2014) From laggard to leader: Explaining offshore wind developments in the UK. Energy Policy 69, 635-646.

Kingdon, JW (1995) Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. HarperCollins College Publishers, New York, USA.

Krasner, SD, Risse, T (2014) External Actors, State-Building, and Service Provision in Areas of Limited Statehood: Introduction. Governance 27 (4), 545-567.

Lederer, M (2012) REDD+ governance. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 3 (1), 107-113.

— (2014 ) The Politics of Carbon Markets in the Global South. In: Stephan, B, Lane, R (eds) The Politics of Carbon Markets, Routledge, Cheltenham.

— (2015) Global Governance and Climate Change. In: Bäckstrand, K, Lövbrand, E (eds) Research Handbook on Climate Governance, 3-13. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

— (2018) External State Actors. In: Börz, TA, Risse, T, Draude, A (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Governance in Areas of Limited Statehood, 191-210. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Lederer, M, Höhne, C (under review) Max Weber in the Tropics: The Bureaucratization of Forestry through REDD+. 26.

Lederer, M, Wallbott, L, Bauer, S (2018) Tracing sustainability transformations – drivers of Green Economy approaches in the Global South. Journal of Environment and Development 27 (1), 3-25.

Lederer, M, Wallbott, L, Urban, F (2019 ) Green Transformations and State Bureaucracy. In: Fouquet, R (ed.), Handbook on Green Growth, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

Lederer, M, Höhne, C, Stehle, F (Forthcoming) External REDD+ Advocates and Nation-States in the Global South. 37.

Leggewie, C, Welzer, H (2010) Another “Great Transformation”? Social and Cultural Consequences of Climate Change. Journal of Renewable Sustainable Energy 2 (031009), 1-13.

Levy, B (2015) Governance Reform: Getting the Fit Right. Public Administration and Development 35 (4), 238-249.

Liefferink, D, Wurzel, RKW (2017) Environmental leaders and pioneers: agents of change? Journal of European Public Policy 24 (7), 951-968.

Mayring, P (2000) Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Beltz, Weinheim.

McKeown, R (2009) Norm Regress: US Revisionism and the Slow Death of the Torture Norm. International Relations 23 (1), 5-25.

Meadowcroft, J (2011) Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 1 (1), 70-75.

Mello, P (2017) Qualitative Comparative Analysis and the Study of Non-State Actors. In: Schneiker, A, Kruck, A (eds) Researching Non-State Actors in International Security: Theory & Practice, 123-142. Routledge, London.

Merkel, W (2010) Systemtransformation. Eine Einführung in die Theorie und Empirie der Transformationsforschung. 2nd Edition edn., VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden/Germany.

Mintrom, M, Luetjens, J (2017) Policy entrepreneurs and problem framing: The case of climate change. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 35 (8), 1362-1377.

Nelson, JM. ed.) (1989) Fragile Coalitions: The Politics of Economic Adjustment. Overseas Development Council, Washington D.C./US.

North, DC (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. eds Alt, J, North, DC. The Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

OECD (2018) Perspectives on Global Development 2019: Rethinking Development Strategies. Perspectives on Global Development, OECD Publishing, Paris/France, 236.

Pahl-Wostl, C, Knieper, C (2014) The capacity of water governance to deal with the climate change adaptation challenge: Using fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis to distinguish between polycentric, fragmented and centralized regimes. Global Environmental Change 29, 139-154.

Pandey, VL, Suganthi, D (2015) Fueling agricultural growth in India: Some reflections. Land Use Policy 42, 227-232.

Pasquini, L, Shearing, C (2014) Municipalities, Politics, and Climate Change: An Example of the Process of Institutionalizing an Environmental Agenda Within Local Government. The Journal of Environment & Development.

Persson, Å, Eckerberg, K, Nilsson, M (2016) Institutionalization or wither away? Twenty-five years of environmental policy integration under shifting governance models in Sweden. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 34 (3), 478-495.

Pimentel, D (2008) Biofuels, Solar and Wind as Renewable Energy Systems – Benefits and Risks. Springer Netherlands.

Purdon, M (2015) Advancing Comparative Climate Change Politics: Theory and Method. Global Environmental Politics 15 (3), 1-26.

Ragin, CC (1987) The Comparative Method. Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.

— (2000) Fuzzy-Set Social Science., University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

— (2004) Turning the Tables: How Case-Oriented Research Challenges Variable-Oriented Research. In: Brady, HE, Collier, D (eds) Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, 123-138. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham.

Ravikumar, A, Larson, AM, Myers, R, Trench, T (2018) Inter-sectoral and multilevel coordination alone do not reduce deforestation and advance environmental justice: Why bold contestation works when collaboration fails. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 36 (8), 1437-1457.

Republic of South Africa (1996) Constitution of the Republic of South Africa In: Africa, GoS (ed.), Pretoria.

Richter, S (2017) Der Wolf im Schafspelz. Illegitime Herrschaft durch State Capture in Nachkriegs- und Transitionsgesellschaften. ZeFKo Zeitschrift für Friedens- und Konfliktforschung 6 (2), 174-206.

Risse, T, Ropp, SC, Sikkink, K (1999) The Power of Human Rights. International Norms and Domestic Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

— (2013) The Persistent Power of Human Rights. From Commitment to Compliance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

Rohlfing, I, Schneider, CQ (2013) Improving Research On Necessary Conditions: Formalized Case Selection for Process Tracing after QCA. Political Research Quarterly 66 (1), 220-235.

Rothbauer, P (2008) Triangulation. In: Given, LM (ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods, 892-894. Sage, Los Angeles.

Rüdinger, A, Voss-Stemping, J, Sartor, O, Duwe, M, Averchenkova, A (2018) Towards Paris-compatible climate governance frameworks. An overview of findings from recent research into 2050 climate laws and strategies, IDDRI, Paris.

Sabatier, PA (1991) Toward Better Theories of the Policy Process. PS: Political Science and Politics 24 (2), 147-156.

Schapper, A (2017) Children’s Rights Implementation as a Multi-Level Governance Process. Human Rights Quarterly 39 (1), 104-129.

Schneider, CQ, Wagemann, C (2007) Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) und Fuzzy Sets. Ein Lehrbuch für Anwender und jene, die es werden wollen. Barbara Budrich, Opladen.

Scoones, I, Newell, P, Leach, M. (eds.) (2015) The Politics of Green Transformations. Pathways to Sustainability. Routledge, Abingdon.

Setiawan, EN, Maryudi, A, Purwanto, RH, Lele, G (2016) Opposing interests in the legalization of non-procedural forest conversion to oil palm in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Land Use Policy 58, 472-481.

Siewert, MB (2017) Qualitative Comparative Analysis. In: Jäckle, S (ed.), Neue Trends in den Sozialwissenschaften, 273-305. Springer, Wiesbaden.

Skocpol, T (1979) States and Social Revolutions:  A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Smoke, P (2015) Rethinking Decentralization: Assessing Challenges to a Popular Public Sector Reform. Public Administration and Development 35 (2), 97-112.

Solymosi, K, Carodenuto, S, Tennigkeit, T (2013) Agriculture and REDD+ – The main driver of deforestation and a key sector for successful implementation of REDD+, GIZ Bonn and Eschborn.

Stehle, F, Höhne, C, Hickmann, T, Lederer, M (2019) The Effects of Transnational Municipal Networks on Urban Climate Politics in the Global South. In: Van der Heijden, J, Bulkeley, H, Certomà, C (eds) Urban Climate Politics. Agency and Empowerment, 210-230. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Straus, S (2015) Making and Unmaking of Nations: War, Leadership, and Genocide in Modern Africa. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.

Thapar, S, Sharma, S, Verma, A (2016) Economic and environmental effectiveness of renewable energy policy instruments: Best practices from India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 66, 487-498.

The Federative Republic of Brazil (1988) Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil In: Brazil, Go (ed.), Brasília.

Tobin, P (2017) Leaders and Laggards: Climate Policy Ambition in Developed States. Global Environmental Politics 17 (4), 28-47.

Tosun, J, Lang, A (2017) Policy integration: mapping the different concepts. Policy Studies 38 (6), 553-570.

Tosun, J, Schoenefeld, JJ (2017) Collective Climate Action and Networked Climate Governance. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 8 (1).

Totin, E, Segnon, A, Schut, M et al. (2018) Institutional Perspectives of Climate-Smart Agriculture: A Systematic Literature Review. 10 (6), 1990.

Turnheim, B, Kivimaa, P, Berkhout, F (2018) Innovating Climate Governance: Moving Beyond Experiments. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Turnhout, E, Gupta, A, Weatherley-Singh, J et al. (2017) Envisioning REDD+ in a post-Paris era: between evolving expectations and current practice. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 8 (1), e425-n/a.

Urban, F (2014) Low Carbon Transitions for Developing Countries. Routledge, Oxon.

Urban, F, Sumner, A (2012) Pro-Poor Low Carbon Development. In: Ockwell, D, Mallet, A (eds) Low Carbon Technology Transfer: From Rhetoric to Reality, Earthscan (forthcoming), London.

van der Heijden, J (2013) Different but equally plausible narratives of policy transformation: A plea for theoretical pluralism. International Political Science Review 34 (1), 57-73.

Wagemann, C (2015) Qualitative comparative analysis. In: Wenzelburger, G, Zohlnhöfer, R (eds) Handbuch Policy-Forschung, 429-452. Springer, Wiesbaden.

WBGU (2011) World in Transition. A Social Contract for Sustainability. Summary for Policy-makers, German Advisory Council on Global Change (WBGU), Berlin.

Weibust, I, Meadowcroft, J. (eds.) (2014) Multilevel Environmental Governance: Managing Water and Climate Change in Europe and North America. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

Wiener, A (2018) Contestation and Constitution of Norms in Global International Relations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 267.

World Resources Institute (2018) ‘CAIT Climate Data Explorer. Historical Emissions’, http://cait.wri.org/historical/, accessed 29th January 2018.

Zimmermann, L (2017) Global Norms with a Local Face: Rule-of-Law Promotion and Norm Translation. Cambridge Studies in International Relations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Stakeholder engagement

INLOCADE is a practically-oriented research project. Through intensive field research as well as regular consultations with experts and relevant stakeholders we are engaging with the broad community involved in climate action. Stakeholders include, but are not limited to the following groups:

  • National and local government officials
  • International organizations and transnational networks
  • Civil society organizations
  • Businesses and private sector initiatives
  • Donors and development assistance